We use cookies to help you navigate efficiently and perform certain functions. You will find detailed information about all cookies under each consent category below.
The cookies that are categorized as "Necessary" are stored on your browser as they are essential for enabling the basic functionalities of the site. ...
Necessary cookies are required to enable the basic features of this site, such as providing secure log-in or adjusting your consent preferences. These cookies do not store any personally identifiable data.
Functional cookies help perform certain functionalities like sharing the content of the website on social media platforms, collecting feedback, and other third-party features.
Analytical cookies are used to understand how visitors interact with the website. These cookies help provide information on metrics such as the number of visitors, bounce rate, traffic source, etc.
Performance cookies are used to understand and analyze the key performance indexes of the website which helps in delivering a better user experience for the visitors.
Advertisement cookies are used to provide visitors with customized advertisements based on the pages you visited previously and to analyze the effectiveness of the ad campaigns.
As I’ve been working on copy for an upcoming catalog, I wanted to find out just how much recognition and reward affect workers’ performance. Although the citations do not focus specifically on training and learning environments, a wealth of research strongly supports the effectiveness of formal and informal recognition. Here are some of the highlights:
A large number of studies over the years have verified that recognition is indeed a powerful reinforcer of employee behaviors leading to performance improvement. A Meta-analysis of 19 reinforcement theory studies revealed an average effect of recognition on performance improvement of 15% (Stajkovic and Luthans, 1997 ).
This was followed by a more comprehensive meta-analysis that examined 72 reinforcement theory studies in organizational settings that found an average effect size of social recognition on performance of 17% (Stajkovic and Luthans, 2003 ). Finally, in a recent field experiment, informal recognition increased performance of workers in the manufacturing setting by 24% (Stajkovic and Luthans, 2001 ). …
A nationwide survey of US workers found that about 70% report that non-monetary forms of recognition provide the best motivation ( HR Focus, 1999). This same survey found that employees favor recognition from managers and supervisors by a margin of almost 2:1 over recognition from co-workers or other sources. (Nelson, 1994).
Fred Luthans and Alexander D. Stajkovic, “Provide Recognition for Performance Improvement.”
In a May 2011 article in the Harvard Business Review, Teresa Amabile and Steven Kramer explain how to “truly engage your workers.” They suggest:
“Help them see their own progress.” Workers’ diaries in a number of jobs show that good days are characterized by three things: progress, “catalysts”, and “nourishers”, and bad days are marked by the opposite: setbacks, inhibitors, and toxins.
Thanks to Kim Marshall and the Marshall Memo, for his brief synopsis of this great article. “The Power of Small Wins” by Teresa Amabile and Steven Kramer in Harvard Business Review, May 2011 (Vol.89, #5, p. 70-80), no e-link available; the authors can be reached at tamabile@hbs.edu and stevek1006@workevents.net.
Bob Nelson, author of 1001 Ways to Energize Employess reports research indicating that the type of recognition employees appreciate most is to be recognized by people they work directly for. In fact, 78% of employees indicated that it was very or extremely important to be recognized by their managers when they do good work (Nelson 2004). The number one choice for recognition is sincere praise given in a timely manner with specific examples.
Definitely not too basic. I like your perspective!